Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has criticised a recent Code of Conduct advisory issued by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), describing it as an attempt to stifle media freedom ahead of the 2027 general elections.
In a statement shared on his X account, Atiku said, “The Code of Conduct advisory issued by the National Broadcasting Commission is yet another troubling attempt to muzzle the media and shrink the space for free expression in Nigeria.”
He argued that Nigeria’s media industry has built a strong reputation globally and should not be subjected to what he described as recurring regulatory pressure, particularly during election periods.
According to him, “Our media industry has grown into a formidable institution, respected globally for its resilience and professionalism. It is therefore alarming that, each time elections approach, the NBC resorts to heavy-handed directives that do more to silence dissent than to uphold ethical journalism.”
The former presidential candidate also expressed support for media organisations resisting what he termed “creeping censorship,” insisting that professional standards in journalism should not be selectively enforced.
“Ethical standards are not seasonal tools to be weaponised during campaigns; they are constant obligations,” he stated, adding that the timing of the directive raises concerns about its underlying intent.
Atiku further warned that the development could undermine democratic processes, saying the government appears more focused on controlling public narratives than ensuring a transparent electoral environment.
The controversy follows an advisory issued by the NBC to broadcast stations across the country as preparations begin for the 2027 elections. In the directive, the commission raised concerns over what it described as increasing violations of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code, particularly in political and current affairs programmes.
The NBC cautioned broadcasters against practices such as presenting personal opinions as facts, intimidating guests during interviews, and denying opposing views a fair hearing. It also signalled plans to enforce stricter compliance, noting that breaches could attract sanctions.
The regulatory body said the move was necessary to restore professionalism, balance, and accuracy in broadcasting, especially during the sensitive pre-election period.
However, the directive has sparked debate within media and political circles, with critics warning that tighter enforcement could be used to limit critical voices, while supporters argue it is needed to maintain ethical standards in election coverage.